223 based cartridge that does this, its called the. 45-70 Government (Accurate 5744 Rifle Data) reloading data with 6 loads. I would guess that a secondary explosion would blow up the gun because of it. Youd need to use a powder slow enough, and enough of it to allow sufficient pressure at the gas port, and a bullet heavy enough to act as a cork, to again, allow the pressure. Loading that low would mean lots of air space in the case instead of powder. My previous thought was with the low recoil of this caliber the action would not be affected as drastically as with the. To be subsonic you would need to be under 1,050 fps. I had taken the time to reinforce the hogue and felt this to be a worthwhile effort until todays range trip. I am satisfied with todays testing and feel more confident knowing the rifle will shoot I just need to locate another take off HS Precision or BC Medalist stock. It is my finding that errors in shooters form, handloading regiment, and poor equipment will magnify with subsonic loads. 300 Whisper and results have been good with both platforms. 5 offers a wide performance range from target and Cowboy Action applications to full power defense loads. This powder is extremely versatile and can be used in many handgun calibers. Today I changed the hogue stock with my HS that was on my 5R and tried again with the same factory Corbon and group shot a solid 3/4" 100. 5 is a fast burning, double-base, spherical handgun propellant. Yesterday I shot a 100 yard group with factory Corbon subs with 220 SMKs and shot a 2" group. I have used diffirent powder and combos of bullets. I have been extremely aggravated with the performance of sub loads in my ACC-SD 300 blackout. Any suggestions for heavier bullet sub loads? Thanks for any help Using the same brass, Forster dies, and I have several pounds of different powders to try. New barrel 1-8 22 inch long no taper 90* crown Old barrel 1-10 16 inch long no taper 11* crown I use magnum primers as I read somewhere that they help with reliable ignition with so little powder in the case. It's about making a rifle do what I want it to. 223 and 50-55gr bullets I would start at 4gr N310 and reduce the load until you're subsonic / happy with velocity. This is not about what I will use it for or why I want to get groups smaller. Things I have tried are giving me around 1 inch groups the best being just a bit under. My issue is now I put a new barrel on with a faster twist to go subsonic and I am looking for advise on reaching a comparable level of accuracy with subsonic loads using heavy bullets 175-240 grains. 3-.4 with standard off the shelf bullets. 35 for five shots when using high end bullets and. I have had decent luck with supersonic loads averaging between. Manufacturing and putting powder on the shelf after changing the formula in any way without saying a peep just doesn't make any sense.I have been working very hard with 300 blackout savage bolt gun over the last year to wring all the accuracy I can out of* this little cartridge. If Hodgedon reformulated BLC-2 and gave it additives for copper fouling and temp stability and renamed it CFE223 that's what I'm talkin about. So the first project is to cast 123 gr bullets in a. plant started a new formula it became N100NF. OK, so I want to create three loads, including casting my own bullets. Had to change the Nitro 100 shotgun powder formula when the Chech plant got caught-up in European politics and a U.S. When Accurate reformulated their No.2 pistol powder in the early 90s they renamed it "No.2 Improved" or something close and after ten years on the shelf the "Improved" was dropped. That way the old formula and the old label can safely use the old product with Labeling of the new formula and market the new formula with new load data when the new powder hits the shipping dock. Way shape or form substantial/significant changes in two huge smokeless powders used by possibly millions of loyal customers all over the world.Įdit to Add: Just thinking, when a popular brand and specific name smokeless powder undergoes a formula change the manufacturer will phase-out the old formula by completely changing the name and has no control over the actual reloading procedures and methods being used, or the condition or choice of firearms and components used, no responsibility for the use of this data is implied or assumed. have in no way announced, promoted, touted or advertised in any View QuoteStill pondering why Western Powders the manufacturer, and big vendors such as Mid-South, MidwayUSA, Natchez, etc., etc., etc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |